FOOD BANKS IN Newcastle and North Tyneside

Food for thought

food bank provision in

Newcastle

Newcastle Council for Voluntary Service

November 2012

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 2 of 9

Thanks

This report seeks to map the development and provision of food banks in Newcastle.

Nationally food banks are a fast rising phenomenon. They are an indicator too of the

difficulties families and individuals are facing as a consequence of the recession and

falling incomes.

Newcastle CVS would like to thank all those who took the time to speak to us and

who provided us with the information included in this report.

Copyright: Newcastle Council for Voluntary Service, 2012

Published by Newcastle Council for Voluntary Service, 2012

Newcastle CVS, MEA House, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8XS

Registered charity 1125877 and company limited by guarantee 6681475

Tel 0191 232 7445 www.cvsnewcastle.org.uk twitter@newcastlecvs

Email ncvs@cvsnewcastle.org.uk Fax 0191 230 5640

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 3 of 9

Introduction

This report gives basic information about food banks in Newcastle upon Tyne and

their services. It goes on to draw attention to some issues and areas for

consideration which have arisen during the research.

The main objective was to map food banks across Newcastle. This involved

documenting food bank contact details, opening times and any other available

information such as the areas they cover.

However, food banks are difficult to locate. There is anecdotal evidence for very

small food bank type provision in very local communities which may even be a

couple of streets. Again there is anecdotal evidence for food bank provision based

around regular religious activities, not just Christian.

There are other issues, for example some agencies hand out vouchers for clients to

hand-in to shops so while they are not food banks as such their effect is very similar.

Context

These are difficult times. The coalition government is pursuing a number of austerity

policies aimed at reducing the amount of government borrowing. The consequences

of these policies include new and increasing restrictions on benefits, reduced

government investment in jobs and a rapidly shrinking public sector.

In addition to these cuts the government is making major changes to the benefit

system and to tax credit entitlements. These changes affect not only those without

work but a large number of people in low paid work.

The corresponding move to more part-time working may partly alleviate the distress

caused by these changes but the problem of low pay and no pay remains.

What do we mean by a ‘food bank’?

A food bank hands out parcels of food to those that need it with no charge to the

recipient. In theory they don’t serve hot food and they don’t offer free gifts. In fact

food banks are often part of a hot food operation and often they will hand out food to

whoever asks for help.

Food banks operate in the following way:

Individuals, businesses and organisations donate food to a food bank.

Food banks collect at supermarkets where shoppers are given a list of items and

asked to buy one or two for local people in need.

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 4 of 9

The collected food is sorted and stored. The food bank staff and volunteers sort the

food by date and pack it into parcels ready to be given out.

People visit the food bank and receive the parcels. Some food banks have no or few

restrictions on who can receive their parcels. Others ask for ID and evidence of need.

Sometimes care professionals such as doctors, health visitors, social workers, and

the Citizens Advice Bureau refer people to food banks.

At the food bank people receive their food parcel and often hot food and drink. Staff

and volunteers may be available to talk with them and signpost them to agencies

which can address longer-term problems.

Some agencies, such as the Trussell Trust, operate a voucher system. Here people

take their voucher to a food bank and redeem it for a set amount of food.

Some food banks run a delivery service to take food parcels to clients who cannot

get to the food bank e.g. because they are unwell, or because they live away from

public transport.

Food banks in the UK

Food banks are a fast growing phenomenon in the UK. The Trussell Trust has more

than 200 food banks on its list and reports that it opened two food banks a week in

the last year (to September 2012). It plans to go on opening new food banks to meet

an increasing need.

Food banks provide support for people in need and an increase in number can only

indicate an increase in need. There are a number of reasons for this, from the difficult

economic situation and changes to benefit rules to increased awareness that such

services exist. With no sign of immediate improvement, the food bank or similar

provision is set to become a familiar sight in local communities.

Where are Newcastle’s food banks?

This research has found food banks to be clustered in the east and west of the city

centre. They tend not to be positioned in residential areas or near the outskirts of

Newcastle. This is partly because many are based at churches.

The food banks users travel to them rather than have a door step service. This can

create problems – the food parcels tend to be rather heavy and for obvious reasons

the food bank users do not usually have their own transport.

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 5 of 9

Food Bank providers

The research identified the following dedicated food banks in Newcastle.

• Children’s Society, Brunswick Methodist Church

• Missionaries of Charity, Durham Street

• Newcastle East Food Bank, Elim Pentecostal Church, Heaton Road

• Newcastle YMCA

• St Andrew’s Church, Newgate Street

• St Joseph’s Asylum Project, Armstrong Road

• Storehouse, Tyneside Vineyard, City Road

• Walking With, Wallsend1

Providers

Perhaps surprisingly Newcastle’s food banks tend to be supplied not by local

donations but by two national providers – The Trussell Trust and FareShare.

The Trussell Trust provides the largest number of food banks across the UK. It

operates the Newcastle East Food Bank and is looking to open a Newcastle West

Food Bank early in 2013.

FareShare collects food that is near to its sell-by date from retailers, and sells it onto

food banks. FareShare is operated in the North East by The Cyrenians and supplies

food for several food banks in Newcastle. The research found that FareShare

services are praised by the food banks they sell to. Nevertheless at least one

organisation has had to stop using their services because they no longer have the

money to pay for them.

The Cyrenians are looking to expand FareShare. In October 2012 they won £15,000

from Santander bank’s Social Enterprise Development Awards to hire new staff and

help set up a scheme in Tees Valley.

Both the Trussell Trust and FareShare are Christian organisations supplying food

banks that often operate from Christian churches.

Outside of the Trussell Trust and FareShare, food banks operate their own

collections e.g. asking supermarkets if they can approach their customers to buy

something extra for the food bank. The food bank staff approach customers entering

the store and wait behind the checkout to collect the donation once the customer has

paid.

Alongside this there are donations from concerned members of the public. Often

these donations go beyond food to include clothing, baby equipment, and even

furniture. The churches are active on this area too using their network to informally

assist donors and focus donations.

1 Though this provider is in North Tyneside, they are used by Newcastle residents.

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 6 of 9

In addition Storehouse is looking to start a food bank network in Newcastle to share

experiences and resources such as a van.

It is reported that local authorities are investing in charity-run food banks to cope with

a demand for help from families in crisis2. However, the research found no evidence

of financial or strategic involvement from the public sector in Newcastle, just referrals

from the Housing Advice Centre (HAC).

Users

Food bank users come from across the city including affluent areas such as

Gosforth. It is not just people on benefits using food banks; the food banks report

increasing numbers of working people on low incomes accessing their services. The

presence of people from affluent areas and of people in-work can be masked by

presenting aggregated statistics.

The food banks report an increase in demand at the start of the summer holidays.

This may be due to children who normally receive free school meals during term time

being at home.

Given the reported scale of the problem (e.g. BBC news, 16 October 2012) the

researcher was surprised not to find even more food banks in Newcastle. However,

further research indicates that food needs in Newcastle are being met in other ways

e.g. through religious organisations as part of their religious activities. The researcher

has found evidence for existing food banks gearing up to meet additional demand

and for new ones about to begin operations.

Other no cost facilities

In addition to food banks there are a number of other facilities in Newcastle providing

food for no cost.

• Blandford Square – Hot drinks and sandwiches, Saturdays

• Peoples Kitchen, The Alison Centre - Hot meals and sandwiches and hot

drinks: 4 sessions at Alison Centre plus 4 street outreach sessions

• Summerhill Square, West Road - Hot meals and sandwiches, Sundays

• The Cyrenians, Ron Eager House – Food and hot drinks: 5 projects in

Newcastle, 1 in Gateshead

• Walter’s Kitchen - Hot dogs, soup and pasta, St Andrew’s Church (Thursday)

and Blandford Square (Sunday)

• West End Refugee Service – Cash hand outs for food

• Edible Elswick, Elswick Community Garden – Free food sessions run by West

End Women and Girls

2 Patrick Butler, The Guardian, 21 August 2012.

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 7 of 9

Findings

There has been an increase in the number of families seeking help from food banks

in Newcastle. This is clear from the presence of new and recently opened food banks

across the city and the demand for their services.

The food banks report that they can hand out all that they can bring in. This indicates

that the need for free food in Newcastle is widespread and increasing though for now

at least it is not overwhelming.

Nevertheless, there is evidence that food banks are becoming part of the support

system instead of a supplementary service to assist longer term solutions. That David

Cameron has welcomed the work of food banks and their growing number shows

that rather than relying on state benefits the needy are being increasingly provided

for by the Big Society3. Taken together with current changes to benefits and

discussions with food bank providers it is reasonable to conclude that this is an

intended consequence.

On a more positive note, collaboration, and even co-location, between food banks

and other services would improve the overall package of help for users. And the

creation of a Newcastle Food Bank network can only help provision.

Finally and most importantly, the hard work of food bank volunteers and the

generous donations of the public do have a huge impact on those affected. This is

clear both from reported testimony and the fact that people keep coming back.

Conclusions

This study highlights the issue of poverty in Newcastle demonstrated by the need for

food banks. Though not the subject of this report, it has also brought up the issue of

‘rough sleeping’ and provided anecdotal evidence of this as both endemic and

persistent.

The study has produced evidence of both a need and an increasing need for food

banks in Newcastle. It has also shown the demand for food kitchens and provided

evidence of increased demand for them.

Clearly then getting enough food is a problem for families and individuals in

Newcastle today.

Some of the main issues these conclusions raise are:

 The public sector’s relationship with food banks as they increase in number –

can the government afford not to fund them?

3 Amelia Gentleman, The Guardian, 18 July 2012.

Food for thought: food bank provision in Newcastle

Page 8 of 9

 The issues of accessibility, such as those concerning faith-based free food

and whether the services of food banks are accessible to all groups e.g. older

people. In other words are food banks accessible to all of the people and to all

of the communities who need their services?

 Raising awareness of poverty not only in Newcastle but throughout the UK -

this will help to reduce stigma around food banks.

 Mutual aid - improving communication between food banks, referral agencies

and other services to create networks and self-help support.

 Practical issues such as storage and distribution – are there sufficient secure

premises available?

These factors will become more important as demand continues to rise.

What’s next?

“Demand has been steadily increasing and the most common reason we have

noticed at our food bank is either debt or benefit changes.” – Food bank coordinator,

Newcastle upon Tyne, 2012.

Food is a basic need and the provision of even a small amount of food has a huge

effect. While they do not deal with the long term underlying issues of hardship and

poverty, food banks help people in a solid practical way at a time when they are both

vulnerable and exposed to other risks.

In general food banks are religious initiatives or community-led projects which meet

an important and necessary need. In so doing they have a positive social impact on

the local community.

Unfortunately the need for food bank services has grown and, without specific

government intervention, this seems set to grow. In fact the government seems intent

on reducing its provision of resources to these very projects.

The view of the food banks themselves is clear: they are responding to increases in

need; their role in local communities is becoming ever more important, and their work

is vital for people in need.

This study has only just begun to scrape the surface. These issues warrant further

exploration.

 

s

e

'Monkseaton North Cabinet Member, Les Miller obviously doesn't rate Tory Mayor Linda Arkley's 'much vaunted' Whitley Bay regeneration very highly when he describes it as s**t. Since Tory Les is being honest, we wonder what else he wants to the lid on? Another Tory 'tweet'

'Monkseaton North Cabinet Member, Les Miller obviously doesn't rate Tory Mayor Linda Arkley's 'much vaunted' Whitley Bay regeneration very highly when he describes it as s**t. Since Tory Les is being honest, we wonder what else he wants to the lid on? Another Tory 'tweet'.

LABOUR URGES MAYOR TO ‘STOP DITHERING’ AND SCRAP CHIEF EXECUTIVE

LABOUR URGES MAYOR TO ‘STOP DITHERING’ AND SCRAP CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Labour councillors in North Tyneside have urged the Borough’s Tory Mayor ‘to stop dithering and scrap the post of Chief Executive of the council.

In Mayor Arkley’s current budget proposals, she has set out plans to ‘delete’ the post of CEO as part of her efforts to turn around a £2m budget shortfall. Her plans would come into force on 31 May 2013 but the Labour majority on the council pushed through a motion last week which would bring the measure into effect ‘immediately’.

The current CEO, Graham Haywood has been employed by the council on a part time basis since 2011 but Labour is arguing that the savings should be made immediately.

Labour group leader Jim Allan said

‘The Mayor should stop dithering, she either needs a CEO or she doesn’t so why not implement her own plan to scrap the post immediately? Full Council voted to pass a measure that would mean further savings last week and the Mayor seems to be dragging her heels over her own proposal. She needs to make savings as the council under her control, has a budget shortfall of over £2m and she needs to answer the question – why not ‘delete’ the post now rather than wait a further 8 months?’

Contact

Jim Allan - Leader of the Labour Group

07909234752

Labour has today launched a Policy Review document entitled "Private Rented Housing: Providing stability and affordability for renters and families".

Press release

Monday 10th December 2012

For immediate use

Labour's Private Rented Housing policy document

Labour has today launched a Policy Review document entitled "Private Rented Housing: Providing stability and affordability for renters and families".

This document sets out new thinking from Labour's Policy Review on giving stability and financial certainty to private renters, including over one million families with children. These proposals would give families and other renters the opportunity to access longer term tenancies allied to predictable rents.

The private rented sector is now a mainstream tenancy with 8.5 million people in England renting privately. But the sector hasn’t just grown, the type of people living in it have changed too. Of the 3.6 million households, nearly a third are now families with children.

But the evidence shows the current model of short-term tenancies and unpredictable rent increases just doesn’t provide families with the stability and the certainty they need.

Jack Dromey MP, Labour’s Shadow Housing Minister, said:

“Families need stability to plan where they send their kids to school and certainty to manage their household budgets.

“That’s why Labour is committed to reforming the private rented sector so it works for Britain’s families. With longer term tenancies and predictable rents, the private rented sector will offer the affordable and stable homes that renters need.

“Families will feel that their rented house is a home and it will help strengthen communities as people put down roots and get to know their neighbours.

“Labour’s One Nation housing policy offers stability for families, certainty for landlords and strengthened communities.”

As part of Labour's Policy Review we are looking at the following areas:

· A private rented sector based on long-termism and responsibility so that families can have the stability and security they deserve.

· Providing access to longer term tenancies allied to predictable rents for renters and families so they can plan ahead and manage their household budgets.

· Removing the barriers that stand in the way of longer tenancies and incentivising landlords to offer renters greater stability if they want it.

· Ensuring that the many responsible landlords who do the right thing are not disadvantaged. That is why Labour will work with the sector to develop a range of possible incentives that will form part of a “something for something” deal for landlords.

Ends

Norma Redfern Labours Candidate for North Tyneside Mayor

Dear Resident, I write to you to explain the situation around the lease

that was granted for the Pitch and Putt Golf  Complex on the Links at

Whitley Bay. The situation has been confused by others associated

with the council  and has caused unrest  and even some anger

amongst local residents about the proposals that recently went in

front of the Planning Committee.

The Planning Committee has to operate with open minds and is not a committee that is allowed to be politically controlled. It has to make a decision based on planning criteria and planning legislation. So when you  as residents receive messages that the planning committee acted Politically when making decisions then it is suggesting that councillors of all persuasions are acting unlawfully.

I can inform you that the Labour Group of Councillors do not make pre decisions and certainly do not use the political whipping system on planning or other quasi judicial committees. I hope that you can accept my assurance that this is a serious matter and those that attempt to mislead you on these matters are doing so to distract from the real facts.

The Labour Group have tabled the following motion for discussion at the Council Meeting on Thursday 29th November 2012 -

“This Council seeks clarification of the lease arrangements for the pitch and putt golf facility on the Links in St Mary’s Ward. In particular, the Clauses contained within the lease which require landlord approval to change and/or alter or extend the building. Council would like a full explanation on who has the responsibility for agreeing the lease and which Cabinet Member was involved in agreeing the lease.”

We are seeking information to ensure public scrutiny of the decisions taken or not taken with the golf facilities. We believe the responsibility for granting permission to any alterations, reconfigurations is the Executive of the Council—namely the Cabinet members. So even with Planning permission being granted it is the conditions contained within the lease which actually controls what is allowed to happen with the facilities, and the Council have to provide written permission before it can be carried out.

Our Group wanted to bring this to your attention as two of your Ward Councillors are Cabinet Members and do have an opportunity to raise the issue in their role as Executive Members. We believe that attempting to pass responsibility on to the Planning Committee is a total smokescreen and actually does not tell you the residents the full facts in an open and honest manner.

We are determined to work with Residents and support them as much as we can, please feel free to make contact on this or any other matter you have a concern about.

Yours faithfully

Norma Redfearn

Firstly, Mr Ogle may want to reflect on who makes the decisions in North Tyneside Council. Labour may have the majority in the council but the Conservative Mayor makes the decisions. For instance, I didn’t make the decision to withdraw funding from Priory and I’m not responsible for the actions of the Local Education Authority.

Dear Editor,

Firstly, Mr Ogle may want to reflect on who makes the decisions in North Tyneside Council. Labour may have the majority in the council but the Conservative Mayor makes the decisions. For instance, I didn’t make the decision to withdraw funding from Priory and I’m not responsible for the actions of the Local Education Authority. So in future, if he wants to accuse ‘the authority of being petty’ he needs to be clear about who is directing his ire at.

Secondly, instead of conducting his discussions through the letter’s pages, why doesn’t he just answer the reasonable questions posed by all political parties in the council? I’m sure the public who have been contacting their elected members in a steady stream would welcome his answers. The issues do not just revolve around these two schools, it is much bigger and deals with education across the Borough.

Thirdly, Mr Ogle goes into great detail about the finance of his school and compares against what other schools receive. Again the facts are in front of him – The current conservative Government introduced the Pupil Premium in April 2011, and is paid to local authorities by means of a specific grant based on January 2011 school census figures for pupils registered as eligible for Free School Meals in reception to Year 11.

Clearly Mr Ogle indicates that he is dissatisfied with the funding for his school but the proposal that he is supporting will not change the Pupil Formula funding as laid down by Government, he does not make a case for going forward and what benefits there will be for the children of North Tyneside. He attempts to compare a school in my ward as though it was doing something wrong, when in fact all schools in North Tyneside are aware of how the funding formulas operate and collaborate with each other for a common set of goals.

Frankly, we now just need the answers to the questions raised over the past 6 weeks which currently remain hidden from the public gaze. Hopefully everyone will be able to see who has been involved and how the decisions have been considered and also if the decisions were made free from any declarable individual interests.

Yours faithfully

Jim Allan

Press Release From Norma Redfern Labours Candidate for North Tyneside Mayor

NORTH TYNESIDE LABOUR PLEDGE TO SCRAP EXTRA REFUSE CHARGE

Councillor Norma Redfearn, Labour’s candidate for elected Mayor in North Tyneside, has pledged to scrap additional charges being introduced to collect garden waste from homes across the borough.

North Tyneside residents are receiving letters from the Council demanding £20 for every garden refuse bin for households to continue having their garden waste collected. Residents have been given until the end of the November to indicate whether they are prepared to pay the additional annual charge for collections. The scheme is due to be implemented in March 2013.

Pledging to abolish this additional charge if she is elected Mayor next year, Norma Redfearn said, “I and many fellow councillors have been getting some angry feedback from residents about the Council's intention to introduce a £20 charge to collect garden refuse. Their negative reaction is hardly surprising. People take the view that the collection of refuse from households should be considered a basic local authority service that people pay their council tax for. It’s no use the Tory Mayor boasting about not raising the council tax but then introducing this type of local stealth tax through the back door. I don't think that's being straight with North Tyneside residents. It also penalises those households who take pride in the upkeep of their gardens and risks increasing incidences of fly tipping. This is an unfair and ineffective way of making savings in the Council’s budget and if elected I shall simply scrap it.”

Norma added, “I have heard that the supposed justification for not charging for this service through council tax is because not everyone wants a garden refuse collection. If this is the case, frankly, I think that’s an absurd argument. People may or may not avail themselves directly of many services but you have to take a view on the overall benefit to the borough and set a charge in a transparent way accordingly. For example, just because a person has no children of their own doesn’t exempt them from contributing to the cost of education in the borough. Basic services aren’t some form of buffet from which one can pick and choose what you want and have your council tax calculated that way. That’s simply ridiculous and unworkable.”

NOTES FOR EDITORS:

1.       Whilst North Tyneside Council has a Tory Mayor elected in 2009, the political composition of the Council is now: Labour 44; Conservative 12; LibDem 4. (In 2009 it was: Labour 21; Conservative 31; LibDem 8.)

   

2.       Councillor Norma Redfearn is the Labour Party candidate for Mayor of North Tyneside in the 2013 election. You can follow Norma’s campaign on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/normaformayor .

CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information on this press release please contact:

Councillor Norma Redfearn

Mobile Telephone: 07759 699 707

eMail: norma4mayor@gmail.com

or

Tony Stephenson

North Tyneside Labour Group Media Unit

Mobile telephone: 07759 660 121

eMail: Labour.NTyneside@yahoo.com